An Exciting New Feature of Three Bulls!

ombuddy seal of approval

Introducing the Ombud… Seal of Approval (OSA)!

Do you, gentle and not so gentle readers, often find yourself approaching new Three Bulls! posts with trepidation verging on fear?

Do you find yourself wondering:

Will there be an Ombud… available if I have any questions, concerns or complaints about this post?

Have the photographs in this post been analyzed by trained professionals for hidden meanings, nuance and most importantly matters related to the state of the union?

Will anything be harmed in anyway by the content of or omissions from this post?

Are the authors of this post sufficiently non partisan?

Does this post contain verified facts and/or science related to politics, life or other contentious issues without presenting the reader with opposing wackadoodle beliefs for balance?

Can the terms “teabag” and “teabagging,” as used in this post, be interpreted in an inappropriate manner?

Does this post contain opinion?

Have the authors considered every side of every coin?

Is this post civil or will it lead to incivility?

Will this post hurt my feelings or the feelings of others?

What’s the number of the complaint line and what happens if it is busy?

Were John McCain and Joe Lieberman briefed on the content of this post?

Will I get hungry part way through this post?

Will I get it?

Continue reading ‘An Exciting New Feature of Three Bulls!’

The St. Pauli Exclusion Principle

We apologize, as usual, for the paucity of posts. The holidays have not been kind to either our creativity or various internal organs. Fortunately, our varied colleagues and commenters have taken up the mantle of ombudspersonality in our stead, entirely unbidden.

We approve of this, on the grounds that it saves us the trouble of doing anything other than browsing for the latest and greatest comments on this blog, and then repackaging them into our occasional column.

However, now that the haze and hangover have abated slightly, we would like to note these displays from our respected colleagues must be applauded. It is wholly appropriate that others have gotten into the (neutral) spirit of the season, given the important developments here at 3B!

A related imploral: you will, I hope, forgive the Management for not as yet completing the usual Pitchfork evisceration in a timely manner. Pinko and Geenie have their hands full, one could say, dealing with effluent other than the P’Fork list itself.

You may now flay the official resident Ombirdspersonpantsmoose in comments for dereliction of duty and gin consumption beyond the realm of mortal sanity. We should also note there may have been a grapefruit wedge involved, but our carefully studied laziness and indifference will not permit full disclosure.

Any and all complaints against other members of staff shall be treated as unfounded slander, and dealt with by New York Law Firm through the usual channels.

We suspect, however, that they might have their hands full at the moment.

Enough of these content laden posts

Canoodle can keep Guy Laliberté. We will keep Calder, Beavis laugh and all.

Madames, Monsieurs, diver et divers Ombudpantisserie, et ceux qui ne sont pas errer mort la terre mangeant des cerveauxxxxxxxxx (également connu Zombi) voilà

The best video link that you will never click through. *sigh*

fish vs shorebird, sort of: Use and abuse of narrative

A week ago, fish posted an excerpt from an SEK LGM post lambasting the film Avatar for having a racist narrative logic, along with a critique of SEK’s argument. The burden of fish’s argument, being of a sort to cause strange colors in shorebirds, led to an exchange of comments (which starts here) and eventually to the slab o’ text making up the main part of this post.

[In 3D where available]

Continue reading ‘fish vs shorebird, sort of: Use and abuse of narrative’

OMBUDSMAN – CAROLS

Ombudsmen are never too neutral to get into the festive spirit!  For this reason, COBA has issued a book of properly neutral – carols for the – holiday season: so that ombudsmen everywhere can engage in muted celebration of this festive occasion without compromising their unbiased roles in society.  Here are a couple of sample carols:











and



















Merry -!

Twas the night before Crispmøøse

Twas the night before Crispmøøse
and all through the høøse
not a creature was stirring
not even a Goobie

The stockings were hung by the chimney with care
In hopes that St. Snag soon would be there

The rashers were nestled all snug in the packs
While visions of snorkels porked in their heads
And Geenie in her kerchief, and I in my trackies
Had just settled our brains for a long winter’s nap

When out in the sink there arose such a clatter
I sprang from the bed to see what was the matter
Away to the kitchen I flew like a flash
Torpedoed sink lettuce and tossed in the trash

The melon of ghost, a pale orange glow
Gave the lustre of mid-day to objects below
When what to my wondering eyes should appear
But a miniature sleigh and 8 tiny møøses

With a brittle old driver, quick with a “cobag!”
I knew in a moment that it must be St. Snag
More rapid than eagles his coursers they came
And he swore and he shouted and cursed them by name
“Now Boubon, now Whiskey, now Entrails, now Poutine,
Now Rump Roast, now Tire Iron, now Scotch, now Gin!

If we were to continue there would be too much ass and not enough time to wish all a peaceful night. Merry Crispmøøse to all the Goobies of all ages!

OH MY GOD THE HORROR

The sounds evident from the far off darkest depths of the Goobiepants indicates Goobie may be concocting a “7 graf review of Rihanna’s new joint” or perhaps “cutting an Orrin Hatch CD.”

Words are Too Cheap

People that are pundits for a living are likely to be asshats, even if they seem like likable 20-something pattable heads.

I thought some of the gang would appreciate this bit from Glennzilla on Ezra Powdered Sugar Klein:

While reading various articles to write this, I came across this amazingly revealing post from Ezra Klein, written on June 8, 2009, about the public option:

Most observers now think that some form of public plan will survive in the final bill. The question is what form of [public] plan? . . . . For most of you, this is the big one. The inclusion of a strong public insurance option has become, for most observers I know, the single most recognizable marker for victory. If the public plan exists, liberals have won. If it’s eliminated, or neutered, then conservatives have triumphed.

Back in June — when most people, according to Klein, believed the final bill would have a public option — the progressive consensus was that the existence of the public option would single-handedly determine whether progressives won or lost (Klein himself wasn’t necessarily adopting that view, only saying that “most of you” have done so). Yet now that the bill will have not merely a “neutered” public option, but no public option at all, the exact opposite decree is issued by the progressive establishment: this public-option-free health care bill is the single greatest achievement since LBJ or, perhaps, even FDR, rendering all progressive opposition to it immoral and insane (see here for a perfect example of this shift). What accounts for that reversal?

Glenn is using the rhetorically cobaggishness of Klein to one up him on the rhetorical leverage gambit. There is the desire for everyone to call bluffs, because most liberal foes of the HCR bill I think would be on the side of getting something better instead. This ignores the inherent asymmetry of the situation. It is easier to destroy than to create. Without the ability to get something better with the coalition you have, one side will always have more leverage, and that is the side of the bad guys. So what are we gonna do without that leverage? Pretend we have it, or move forward and keep fighting?

Pitchfork Cobaggery Watch 2009 Numbers 80-61

Being filled with an infinite amount of love and beauty due to the arrival of Goobie has very much changed my outlook on the Pitchfork Top 100. I am brimming with optimism and collegiality. You might say that. Or you might say I’ve become more protective of Goobie’s environment with a growing desire to protect her from the bad things in this world.

Pitchfork listo here. Our previous 100-81 here.

And away we go!

Continue reading ‘Pitchfork Cobaggery Watch 2009 Numbers 80-61′

Interlude

Goobie and I have been working on the Pitchfork Cobaggery Watch1. Therefore I will provide this:

100_1881
Even Goobies need to maximize product placement revenue. We’ve sold out for tater tots and orange cream slushes.

But also some parent web-logging for those unaware at how sinister and dangerous the world can be for Goobies. Just as Goobies represent all that is good, there is a dark side that represents eyeless, swallowing, mindless evil. We must be vigilant against such forces. To wit, documented just now in Goobie’s inner sanctum!

100_1890

Sink Lettuce!2


  1. For us to poop on [back]
  2. is coming from inside the room!!!! [back]



Bad Behavior has blocked 555 access attempts in the last 7 days.