Archive for the 'CONTEST!!' Category

alrighty then

It’s generally at about this point in the blogging lulls that I put forth some half-a**ed post that so horrifies the other bullsies that they spew forth actual content like Eyjafjallajokul spews forth ash on a restless day. Doneski!!!!!

Also we are challenging Riddled to a Wellington street art competition.

definitely not banksy

Best found art wins. I have dibs on “Darth Vader playing the Rubik’s cube.”

Modern Family Gay Icon Pet Contest

The show already got us started:

  • Shel Turtlestein
  • Fliesaminnelli
  • Zsa Zsa Gaboa

Here are my entries:

Chare
Barbarangutan Streisand
Gerbil Garland
Lance Bassett Hound
Tabby Fae Bakker
Kylie Minnow

Top Mullet

My entry:

Fish will probably top it in about a nanosecond. I ask that he wait to crush us while everyone else gets their entries.

Oh, J wants everyone to shower together. That’s what f-bot told me. What time is good for everyone?

We Urge Our Reader

to refuse to legitimize the annual travesty of everything that is the Weblog awards. Should they choose to legitimize such a travesty, we note, under no duress, that one web logger, bluish of countenance, has been nominated by her peers. We note that as the contest do not result in the eating of disgusting cookies, we shall allow our reputations to be clouded by accusations of electioneering. Go now, if you must.

Concern/Troll Olympics

Everything is on the table here. I knew it would happen organically due to the exclusive nature of Trader Joes Marcona almonds with Rosemary and Sea Salt, but I think we should have a contest. Troll or Concern Troll comments on these classes of generic blog post:

A) This non-uniformly distributed thing/resource is awesome! [Spectrum= private yacht with helicopter sub > iPhone > Chick-Fil-A > Trader Joes Marcona Almonds with Rosemary and Sea Salt > Fresh air > Shelter > Loving parents etc.]

B) Criticism of other person/blogger [Spectrum= god, non-existence of god, patriarchy, John Aravosis, Matthew Yglesias, Republic of Dogs, Uncanny Canadian]

C) A joke about something possibly “serious” or even serious.

D) A discussion of ism being relative to one’s point of view.

I thought of this last night, but KWB set the table this morning.

Bonus points for “this is no laughing matter, but” and “Perhaps you are not aware, but”

This does not mean that all such comments are invalid or trolly, I’m just saying do your best to find the concerniest comment you can for any generic situation.

The Worm Has Turned

Since we are mortified on our death beds that Josh Marshall who appears to have been flying on stale Halloween candy all weekend makes a joke that we may have ourselves contemplated deep in our horrible psychological morass of filed observational humor, in penance we reveal to you the magic recipe to make Brussels sprouts taste good.

Kevin William Baker said some stuff we though hit the spotzoes.

Snag continues to turn the screw on his suburban mystery. (Go back to the beginning if you need to).

Also, I think we need to have a vote whether we should consider having a new header harvesting gambit of the contest variety. A precontest contest. The smartest assest vote wins Yelp! to come live in their home and comment on their goings about.

The Bohemian Rhapsody of Bacon?

The Yngwie Malmsteen of Bacon? The Kuma’s kind of bacon? This bacon is so overkill ____ contest kind of bacon.

We discuss today J. Samuel Whiting Bacon. For our birfday last year we received Grateful Palate’s Bacon of the Month from our fam. They are treasured.

We have not kept up with discussing each bacon with you because the end results have basically been a continuum between tasty BLT and amazing BLT. Also, we knew that we would not even be original as we could merely outsource to a number of better prepared cob loggers on the Bacon of the Month front (more in a minute).

First, let’s see how this suspect bacon is discussed by Grateful Palate:

Sweet aroma, thin and crunchy. Perfect balance like a fine cut diamond. Sweet and powerful, almost fruity. Addictive, soft, lush, judicious use of fat and sublimely balanced. AWESOME and hedonistic. Very unique, sweet, yet savory bacon. Kids love all bacon, but they will especially love this bacon made by J. Samuel Whiting Meats in Pennsylvania.

Hmm, intriguing. Our thoughts in a moment. To the gallery of web log contributors. BEERORKID.com:

It was like xmas when this showed up. The packaging was darn good and two pounds of J. Samuel Whiting Bacon smiled back at me. I had to wait for a special occasion to test it out. Saturday turned out to be a perfect time. It looked pretty awesome and thick. I knew I was gonna be drinking on the beer bus soon so I just did two pieces.

The smell was sweet with a nice smoke aroma, not too much. Cast iron was the only way to go and I slowly cooked it to near crisp. The smoke smell was sweet while cooking. Not much fat rendered out while cooking. It was sticking to my uber seasoned cast iron pan which was odd. I think the sugar and lack of grease caused that.

I paired it with two eggs and some hash browns. It was pretty thick so it was not overly crispy. The flavor was very clean, sweet, with a hint of smoke. It was after taking a bite that the real flavor came out. The aftertaste was awesome. Very impressed.


You Call This A Vacation
:

J. Samuel Whiting’s packaging leaves quite a bit to be desired, but their bacon was actually very impressive. According to the Bacon of the Month insert, they placed first at the 2005 Pennsylvania Meat Processor’s Association competition. I have no idea how prestigious this competition is, but I can assure you the award is well-deserved. Thick-sliced and quite lean, the cooked product had great texture and flavor that’s definitely well-suited to be eaten in whole slices. The BLT’s were fantastic, and the bacon was a great complement to the cinnamon french toast we made for breakfast this morning.

This bacon was clearly the best of the recent offerings. I’m going to give it first place (for now), but it’s pretty unfortunate that we can’t do a head-to-head comparison with the previous frontrunner.

We will now offer you our thoughts.

1) We got a bad package. The package was vacuum sealed, and while the seal part was intact, the vacuum was not applied. This means the bacon will have an off taste because of oxidation of the fat.

2) We read the ingredients on the cure. The awesome aftertaste? The extreme savoriness? This bacon featured MSG and a couple kinds of hydrolyzed protein in the cure. The proteins will act like MSG in an unholy trifecta. This bacon would fail a drug test. This bacon was juiced!!!!!

3) Contrary to Grateful Palate’s description on thickness, the bacon was nicely thick. The fat had an interesting quality, and likely the bacon was of such a cure that there would be some rendering of fat but not substantial shrinkage due to excess liquid content. The bacon was cooked on medium heat on a gas burned in a Calphalon pan. The bacon was cooked until done, but without any overdone, deep-fried attributes (the bacon remained chewy with slight crispy bits on the perimeter).

4) The bacon seemed fatty but tasted extremely meaty. Even the fat somehow tasted meaty and perfectly chewy. The bacon was slightly sweet, and the off-notes from the poor packaging were detectable, but something about this bacon said “YOU DON’T CARE ABOUT OFF-NOTES. EAT MORE” This bacon was as close to an unstoppable force of meat product overkill that I could possible imagine. I would love to see an fMRI of my brain while eating this. The savoriness was indeed the most notable attribute and could be directly ascribed to the MSG. Bacon is beloved by my mouth and I have tasted immeasurable amounts of wonderful bacon, and the J. Samuel Whiting experience is likely as close as I have come to feeling like food has mind control. I have been presented the opportunity to shake magic shake on my Korean Fried Chicken (MSG and black pepper) and the result was an inability to stop seasoning the food. I submit to you that this bacon is the Barry Bonds of bacon. It is up to you whether you would like to put it in your tastebud Hall of Fame or Hall of Shame.

5) This bacon, when put in the refrigerator did not get that refrigerator reconfiguration of molecules that makes tomorrow’s cold fridge bacon seem fatty and weird, this bacon was still chewy and wonderful on the flipside. The fat looked like it was there but it didn’t taste like it was there. Perhaps this had to do with the fact that the entire product was bathed in mouth crack?

6) I’m ready to order some more of the abomination.

The Unannotated Liberal Style

It is too obvious, and needs only fictional support for the obviousness to be even more apparent than is already deeply obvious. I think we’re toast.

Observe the Conservapedia identifying the clotheslessness of the American Liberal, né Progressive.

Quoth Conservapedia: The style of a liberal often includes these characteristics:

1. Uses the term “controversial” to describe what he opposes (e.g., classroom prayer), but not to describe what he supports (e.g., theory of evolution)

C. I think Jesus Christ should be praised in our schools by all students, regardless of their personal beliefs.

L. That seems illegal, and controversial to boot.

C. [Does shocker gesture in mock surprise]

2. A lack of originality and a predominance of copying and imitating.

C. Hey check out this Malkin post with 500 trackbacks!

L. I agree with this digby post on a topic very important to me, the direction of our country.

C. !!!

3. Virtually never criticize hateful comments or behavior by a fellow liberal.

C. Why have you not commented about serious problems at Republic of Dogs?

L. I was unaware of such a post.

C. Your silence on this issue spe- er, is very telling.

4. Obsession with the media, and even the few conservatives in the media.

L. Why are David Brooks and Bill Kristol wrong all the time? Also, the entire network devoted to Conservatives, Fox News?

C. You want to have their babies. You sicken me.

5. Like to use the phrase “Silence Speaks Volumes”

L. Hey, are you going to respond to the contradictory nature of issues 5 and 7?

C. I’m not going to dignify that.

L. Whatever flo’s yer bo. Anyhoo, I’m going to this talk tonight, Joe Silence is going to do some readings from The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, entitled “Silence [muffled]…”

Continue reading ‘The Unannotated Liberal Style’

3Bulls! LLC is aware of all internet traditions

This is not a filler post.

This is a post to address certain minor issues which have been clawing for the attention of the Ombudsmoose for various periods of time. Kindly bear with us, as there is important news below.

Today, we address nefarious outside influences, since there is nothing to complain about here. If there is, you should know the drill by now (or, preemptively, at least a bit).

We begin, in true half-assed fashion, with the important news that trolls on certain other fine blogs are aware of all internet traditions.

This may be the first instance of a troll doing something useful in the history of the ol’ tubes, and we applaud the success of their continued mocking. The estimable John Cole has much, much more on this meta-meme.

Second, Pinko Punko notes the suspicious silence of the Canadian Curling Association on the Strange Mystery of the Severed Feet in the Water. He writes:

could the ombuds address the Canadia Severed Foot issue, and not to belittle this macabre situation, but has the CCA commented? It is irresponsible not to speculate. If we were CNN we would pronounce our conventional wisdom as fact.

Sadly, the facts of the matter are that six [EDIT: the sixth was a hoax] severed shoe-clad feet (five right, one left) have washed ashore in various parts areas of the Lower Mainland. Their origin has yet to be confirmed, but marine accidents have been suggested as a possible culprit.

Also, there is at least one woman’s foot which has been found in this fashion, putting at least one particular theory to rest.

The CCA has declined to launch an internal investigation. Speculation, as always, is heartily encouraged. Grippers or sliders? Only time will tell.

M. Night Shyamalan, remarkably, has yet to purchase the movie rights.

More importantly, we should like to remind the Editor that “Canadia” is a purely imaginary place, inhabited by poutine-eating bilingual chain-smoking ice fishermen who uptalk a lot. No such area exists in the Great White North. We suspect PP has been using Conservapedia as a reference. Or possibly Bob and Doug McKenzie.

HOWEVER, because you have all been so good as to read this far, we have received persimmon to declare a new contest!!!!1!1!!! In the spirit of redundancy, the contest is to determine the best idea for a contest. Ideas for contests, methods, and prizes may be entered below, with the winner getting… a chance to enter the contest along with everyone else.

Out of respect for our imminently pupating colleagues, this contest will run until the end of the month, at which point a vote will be held in the traditional fashion. Which is to say: the most complex variation of the democratic process we can determine. Consider it practice for the upcoming election.

Don’t say we never do anything for you, dear readers, but if you find that this is indeed the case, complaints may be submitted to the usual address.

BUBBLE TEA

BUBBLE TEA BUBBLE TEA

Kathleen and I have a special place in our hearts for the consumer review site Yelp. It is just so darned cute with the mini-meta novels that get typed concerning various food establishments etc.

K points me to this article concerning some Yelp quality.

K and I are going to have a running Yelp-Off. Here’s my first volley.

EWWW I HATE THIS PLACE. When u first walk in it smells like old plastic, they seat you then they just leave u there, the tables are sticky, so are their utensils which is one of my biggest pet peeves. And for the record, ive only eaten there 3 times and 3 out of the 3 times i have gotten out of the restaurant puking in the parking lot. Sorry, don’t mean to gross anyone out but i thought the third time was a charm and maybe id get over it. But i couldnt understand why everytime i ate nam vang i would yak. I came to the conclusion that the restaruant is not anything close to sanitary and thats why i had that allergic reaction

I suggest science was used! N=3, puke=3. 3/3=100% puke ratio. Thanks, Yelper!




Bad Behavior has blocked 1769 access attempts in the last 7 days.