If you were to keep dividing our ass in two, you would normally not reach the no-ass state. But with us, it is most likely no-ass to begin with. I have been thinking about our failure to bring you the japes and tom-foolery (Chuck Woolery?) you so crave. I am flogging myself for losing the keys to the pantload mobile.
And another thing. I forgot to start watching a TV show that I hate and talk about it on my web log after each episode. One of the reasons for this is that the entire internet is already like that. The show is THIS MORTAL GODDAMNED COIL, and we are being tortured off of it, some more literally than others. Tomorrow: last minute ideas for Halloween. No worries, Dan Riehl, you can go as yourself.
Pinko? Didn’t you understand or like my Sam Sheppard soft porn post? Pshaw! I’m think of going all soft porn all the time.
You should join us at Mannion’s place Monday nights to rip on Studio 60. Wolcott even showed up last week! It’s a blastaroo!
Not as fun as my soft porn, but still.
hahahahahahahah-
I thought I was being subtle, but I half-assed that, too.
Someone should derive the function in question. Namely:
Given that: 3B=ass/2,
and given that: PP=1/3(3B),
PP=ass/6
Therefore, PP is not fully responsible for the half-assedness of 3Bulls!, but at the least more than one sixth of said ass. Unless the ass in question inhabits pants of a doughy variety.
Now, the argument could be made that P=root(ass/6) OR (ass/6)/P, for a given value of ass, which implies that PP is in fact exponentially more responsible for the aforementioned semi-posteriority of the blog. Someone with ACTUAL background in mathematics can work out the theoretical limits of the half-ass in question, where teh l4m3 (of course) would constitute the lower limit and your mom would describe the upper limit of same. Don’t forget to adjust for inflation.
Gross!
Heh, MD said “your mom.”
You lost the keys to Jonah Goldberg’s amazon reviews? That’s just awful!
Password guesses…eggoes; galactica; spock; lewinskitehroxxormysoxorrowr; mmmdonuts; mommasweetsweetmomma…
Somebody needs to do a review on this pronto!
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000BTYOLQ/ref=pd_rvi_gw_1/102-3666816-5085753
Please note also the catalogue number:
B000BTYOLQ
Jubblies!
But what of TYOLQ? A precursor, perhaps, to a certain acronymous entity?
I cannot stop gigglypants about TYOLQ. So witty, so elusive.