Three Bulls! Mea Culpa and Lesson in Backhanded Apologies

Three Bulls has to admit to several crimes against humanity, but today we stand defiant.

1) We didn’t know that stealing someone’s image from their cobag website was this fancy word “plagiarism”. We thought that was diarrhea for two months after drinking deerpoopwater.

2) We missed the Afterschool Special very special broadcast about the victimless crime of plagiarism, which as non-journamalism college newspaper writers, how are we supposed to know about this vastly technical field?

3) We were only joking, just like when we set all those church fires and made the pledges do an elephant walk and shove ding dongs up their hoo-haws. Gosh, can’t liberals take a joke?

4) We will perservere through this adversity, with the help of Cookie Jesus. And Ben and Jerry Mary.

5) Parrotline made us do it.

6) We just didn’t know what to write. And it kept happening over and over again.

7) Our lawyers at New York Law Firm are investigating the possibility that using a hypothetical “time traveling device” the individual named in the affadavit, a Mr. Gavin M[redacted] did, with malice aforethought, steal our post about Ben, that we claimed Ben did post, only in an after the fact unremarked update, that we did post with no evidence of guilt.

8) Can’t you see this wep bage has hit hard times?

9) First they came for Ben, and nobody said anything. Then they came for RedState chumpalumps and the world rejoiced.

10) ”

And now those opposed to Ben Three Bulls! have googled prior writings that on the surface appear suspicious, but only because permissions obtained and judgments made offline were not reflected online by an out dated and out of business campus newspaper. [this is my favorite line, it's like Jalen Rose talking about why he was at the crack house- ed.] But that’s all the opponents want – just enough to sabotage a career, though in the process they will sabotage themselves. Facts have no meaning. Only impressions have any bearing on this. The charges of plagarism are false, meant to bring down a good and honest man. The presented facts to prove plagarism are specious — products of shoddy work. One could easily think the producers of 60 Minutes II were behind them [Indeed cobags, indeed].”

11) Sadly, No, Gavin did not see the invisible quotes around our post.

12) 60 Minutes II has an axe to grind against Three Bulls!

13) Fine we did it, sue us for caring. *sob*

6 Responses to “Three Bulls! Mea Culpa and Lesson in Backhanded Apologies”


  1. 1 Seitz

    Don’t sweat it. I’m pretty sure the only things you plagiarized were movie reviews or other things equally meaningless, and I think those are exempt from plagiarism. It’s all good.

  2. 2 gavin m.

    Holy crap, where did that quote come from?

  3. 3 Pinko Punko

    RedState baby!

    linked in last post

  4. 4 Pinko Punko

    just updated it.

    There is something that is not known. What is not known is this. The reason I was at that house.

  5. 5 Chuckles

    Reading about this plagiarising thing has been a lot of fun. Can anyone think of some dumbass wannabe liberal that has totally been a chode that we can all jump to defend and just make crap up about in the process?

    I know, me! I plagiarized an Arthur C Clarke story word for word in 5th grade! I thought transcribing was the same as writing when I was a child. Oh wait, I see the difference here. I was ELEVEN and I learned that it was wrong and since then, I have only plagiarized for humor’s sake. Like when I ripped off PopRen for kicks.

  6. 6 Yosef

    Holy jeez! Where did that quote come from?

Leave a Reply




Bad Behavior has blocked 884 access attempts in the last 7 days.