Comments on: Calling all ombirdsmëëse

By: Mendacious D

Mendacious D — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:44:19 +0000

The URL contained a malformed video ID.

Total control now, biatches!

By: billy rotten

billy rotten — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:28:23 +0000

Complete control

By: Mendacious D

Mendacious D — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:15:54 +0000

Everything is under control. Also, "gravytars" puts me in mind of a geenie emerging from a gravy boat. It would explain much about this blog.

By: Kathleen

Kathleen — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:56:55 +0000

and Mandos wins!!!

By: Gnarles Barkley

Gnarles Barkley — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:40:35 +0000

You really think you’re in control?

By: Charles Barkley

Charles Barkley — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:46:19 +0000

“can we haz gravytars?”

By: Mendacious D

Mendacious D — Mon, 26 May 2008 15:58:52 +0000

Grammar correction: “can we has gravytars”

And Haloscan is a cruel, capricious, and vindictive creature that finds my very existence offensive. It’s like being back in Sunday school, but with better booze and less swearing.

I actually tried to create a new blog just to re-import the non-Haloscanned template. It failed in epic fashion. If anyone knows how to excise the tumorous (timorous?) blight I’d be happy to take their advice.

And I should really write a post here at some point. Suggestions?

By: plover

plover — Sat, 24 May 2008 07:51:17 +0000

Contumely, perhaps?

By: Gregor Samsa

Gregor Samsa — Sat, 24 May 2008 07:43:12 +0000

I think that we need another concept besides contempt.

By: mdhatter

mdhatter — Sat, 24 May 2008 04:18:28 +0000

And can we have gravytars?

By: plover

plover — Sat, 24 May 2008 03:54:06 +0000

Of course, now the comments appear to be showing up just fine.

Haloscan hates me.

Can we hold Haloscan in contempt of 3B? Do we need a parliamentavian to go with our ombirdsmøøse?

By: mdhatter

mdhatter — Sat, 24 May 2008 03:31:18 +0000

I second your commotion