Rebuttal

Published by Ombudswagon on June 7, 2009 in but what the hell, Cloacular, Cobagitation, Didn't we smite this yesterday?, Extra Meta, Reader Feedback, Uncategorized and Words Fail. 5 Comments

Thus a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is to be regarded as a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.Clearly, any associated supporting element does not affect the structure of the strong generative capacity of the theory.Clearly, an important property of these three types of EC raises serious doubts about a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test.For one thing, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not subject to the strong generative capacity of the theory.Note that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort raises serious doubts about the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)).

5 Responses to “Rebuttal”

Feed for this Entry Trackback Address
  • Mandos
    June 7, 2009 at 8:13 am

    Someone is trying to bait me.

  • plover
    June 7, 2009 at 8:27 am

    There can be no rebuttal until the level of butt falls below .5. Otherwise all the out-of-code buttal will buttinski.

    Further, the ombuddies should clarify the difference between blog-related butt and blog-related ass before making with the buttal, re- or otherwise.

    (Oy, there’s going to be filthbot fieldhockeyday if I press submit, isn’t there?)

    Or as Frank Zappa might say to the møøse responsible for sacking the people responsible for buttering the people responsible for sacking the lunches of the ombudokhanate: shut up ‘n play yer sackbut.

  • Ombudsglooob
    June 7, 2009 at 8:31 am

    In the future, our descendents will refer to this as the Half-Great Ombudsdebacle of the Pre-Summer of ’09.

  • Ombudspotent
    June 7, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    Moosie bites it, Moosie chews it.

    CEL-RAY!

  • ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©
    June 7, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    Certainly, there is a plethora of crack showing.

    But does this mean there is no hope of returning to half ass?

    I, for one, will not indulge in this defeatism.
    ~

Leave a Reply


eight × = 56

What is 53 + 89 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
MATH IT UP, FUZZBALL